Examples
Strategy Example
Example Strategy document for product-market fit
Strategy Example
This example shows a Strategy document focused on achieving product-market fit.
---
type: strategy
version: 0.1
schema: stratmd
last_updated: 2026-02-04
owner: Product Team
parent: [[corporate-strategy]]
---
# Strategy: Product-Market Fit
## Strategic Intent
**Question Answered:** How do we achieve product-market fit in the SMB segment?
**Theme:** Focus on one vertical, nail it, then expand.
## Context
Our product serves multiple verticals but excels in none. Customer feedback
indicates we're "good enough" but not "must-have." We need to make a deliberate
choice to focus.
After analyzing our customer base, professional services firms (consultants,
agencies, freelancers) show the highest NPS and lowest churn. This segment
represents 40% of our current revenue despite minimal targeted marketing.
## Approach
We will focus exclusively on professional services firms for the next 12 months.
This means saying no to feature requests from other verticals.
Key initiatives:
1. Redesign onboarding for consultants
2. Build invoicing integrations
3. Create industry-specific templates
### What We're NOT Doing
- Building e-commerce features
- Expanding to enterprise (>500 employees)
- International expansion
- Mobile app development
## Objectives
| ID | Objective | Measure | Current | Target | Deadline |
|----|------------------------|------------------|---------|--------|------------|
| O1 | Achieve PMF signal | NPS | 32 | 50+ | 2026-06-30 |
| O2 | Reduce churn | Monthly churn % | 4.2% | 2% | 2026-06-30 |
| O3 | Increase referrals | Referral rate | 5% | 15% | 2026-06-30 |
## Initiatives
| ID | Initiative | Owner | Status | Deadline |
|----|-------------------------------|-------|-------------|------------|
| I1 | Consultant onboarding redesign | Sarah | in_progress | 2026-03-15 |
| I2 | QuickBooks integration | James | planned | 2026-04-30 |
| I3 | Template library | Maria | planned | 2026-05-15 |
## Assumptions
| ID | Assumption | Confidence | Validation Method | Status |
|----|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------|-----------|
| A1 | Professional services is large enough | 80% | Market size analysis | validated |
| A2 | Focus will accelerate word-of-mouth | 70% | Referral tracking | untested |
| A3 | Features translate to other verticals | 75% | Customer interviews | untested |
## Risks
| ID | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | Owner |
|----|-------------------------------|------------|--------|----------------------|-------|
| R1 | Vertical too small | Low | High | Market size analysis | Sarah |
| R2 | Competitor moves faster | Medium | Medium | Speed to market | James |
| R3 | Alienate other verticals | Medium | Low | Clear communication | CEO |
## Decisions
| ID | Decision | Date | Rationale |
|----|---------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------|
| D1 | Focus on professional services | 2026-01-15 | Highest NPS, lowest churn |
| D2 | 12-month commitment to focus | 2026-01-20 | Sufficient time to validate |
## Metrics
| ID | Metric | Type | Current | Target | Trend |
|----|----------------------|----------|---------|--------|--------|
| M1 | NPS (prof services) | lagging | 32 | 50 | up |
| M2 | Monthly churn | lagging | 4.2% | 2% | stable |
| M3 | Feature adoption | leading | 23% | 60% | up |
## Foundation Alignment
| Element | ID | Statement | Alignment Notes |
|---------|----|----------------------------------------|---------------------|
| Belief | B1 | Small businesses are underserved | Core target market |
| Belief | B2 | Simplicity drives adoption | Guides feature work |
## Success Criteria
- [ ] NPS reaches 50+ for professional services segment
- [ ] Monthly churn drops below 2%
- [ ] 3+ customers cite our focus as reason for choosing us
## Changelog
| Date | Change | Reason |
|------------|----------------------|-----------------------------|
| 2026-02-04 | Initial strategy | Q1 planning complete |
| 2026-01-20 | Added R3 | Board feedback on risk |